Is Microsoft Defender Enough, or Do You Still Use Third-Party Antivirus?

Unison

Well-known member
VIP
Is Microsoft Defender Enough, or Do You Still Use Third-Party Antivirus?

Windows Security has improved considerably over the years, and Microsoft Defender now includes real-time protection, ransomware safeguards, firewall controls and cloud-based threat detection.

Some people believe Defender, sensible browsing habits and keeping Windows updated provide all the protection a home user needs. Others still prefer packages such as Bitdefender, Norton, ESET or Malwarebytes for their additional features and protection.

Third-party security programs can provide useful extras, but they may also increase background processes, use more memory, display unwanted notifications and sometimes slow a computer down.

So, what protection do you currently use?

  • Microsoft Defender on its own?
  • Defender with an occasional Malwarebytes scan?
  • A complete third-party security package?
  • Something different entirely?
Have you ever removed a third-party antivirus and noticed that your computer ran better afterwards?
 
Defender for me nowt else these days if someone wants to gain access they probably will

never had a known issue for years

sometimes i will run an online external virus scan or Malwarebytes

but nothing ever found

commonsense prevails
 
Defender for me nowt else these days if someone wants to gain access they probably will

never had a known issue for years

sometimes i will run an online external virus scan or Malwarebytes

but nothing ever found

commonsense prevails
thanks I'll stick with Defender i just hate paying for anything (y)
 
I've used Kaspersky for years, works well, have deep dived all the concerns, never once found anything to put me off, dealt with CS a few times and always found them to be ,efficient honest and polite.
Like most things these days prices have increased but not enough to deter me from continuing with them.
 
Back
Top